Latest Posts Meditation Personal Development Practice

The Solitaire Meditation

Written by Joseph Carrabis

One of the people I’m working with needed some help sensing the energies around him. I suggested what we’re calling “The Solitaire Meditation”.

The Solitaire Meditation is straightforward. Play solitaire and win.

Simple, correct?

Well, there’s some hitches. Aren’t there in everything? For one, we define a win as knowing, before you start to play, whether you’ll win or lose. Did you believe you’d win and you did win? Then you score +1. Did you believe you’d lose and you lost? Then you score +1. Did you believe you’d win and you lost? Score 0. Thought you’d lose and you won? 0.

Do you recognize what we’re doing? Does it make sense? It’s not about winning or losing, it’s about knowing what will happen before it happens.

Granted, this precognition training is only a few minutes into the future. A few minutes into the future, meh.

Months back I was talking with a friend about how we each start our days. I shared that I play four different games of solitaire each morning, usually one hand each. I’m not interested in winning each game, I’m interesting in how winning or losing each game affects me.

My goal is to stay centered, not let winning or losing pull me off balance, fill me with pride or crush my ego. I can tell by how I’m playing if I’m starting my day off-balance unawares. When I am and when I recognize it, I center, I focus, I slow and lower my breathing. I shuffle the cards and play again. Sometimes I’ll be playing different kinds of solitaire for 15-20m before I’m centered enough that I win every game.

But wait a second…didn’t I write above that it’s not about winning?

That’s right, it’s not, and I’ll get back to that in a second.

Train yourself to understand the future will happen no matter what you do about it – even if it means losing at something – and you learn to accept whatever the future has in store for you. You don’t have to like it and if you can know what’s coming before it comes you can better prepare yourself for it.

That part, that understand-accept-prepare part, that has to do with getting rid of your ego. Ego in the sense of “I’m somebody and I can do something about it.”

Lots of times you can and lots of times you can’t. And sometimes letting go of your ego is a real pain in the ass.

It can also bring you an amazing amount of peace, surety and confidence. If you know what’s going to happen, even if you don’t like it, at least you’re better prepared for it and you can meet whatever it is with lots more confidence than if you didn’t know what was coming at you and got blindsided by it.

After you get winning or losing a few minutes into the future down, push it further and further into the future. Time is a distance, like any other. Somebody somewhere convinced you that you could look down a street to an intersection but you couldn’t look down a street to what happened five minutes ago or will happen five minutes from now.

But isn’t that knowing if you’ll win or lose at solitaire before you pick up the cards? You can know what’s going to happen with the cards in five minutes but not down the street in five minutes? If you train to do one, you’ll be able to do the other.

Years ago I wrote about playing Russian Bank, a two-handed solitaire game, with Susan and knowing who’d win just by the initial lay of the cards:

Susan (wife, partner, beloved, Princess, …) and I play a card game called Russian Bank, a two deck solitaire. Each player puts four cards from their deck on the table face up to start the game and I can predict who’ll win (accuracy well over 90%) simply by seeing how the cards are laid out at the start. This accuracy climbs as the game is played, and I’m usually able to pick the exact point where the outcome is finalized and why. …

Let’s focus a bit on that “knowing” part. Let’s chunk it down. How about instead of knowing whether you’ll win or lose, let’s focus on knowing which card should be played when and where.

I mean, if you can know whether or not you’ll win or lose, and that’s a few minutes out, it should be much simpler to know if the card you’re about to play should be played the way you’re going to play it.

Heck, we’re going from minutes to seconds. Probably less.

Now, if you’re really paying attention, you should pick up that if you know you’re going to win the game anyway, it shouldn’t matter which card you play when because you’re still going to win.

Absolutely, completely, uninterminably correct.

Maybe.

What if you don’t want to teach yourself to sense whether you’ll win or lose? What if you want to teach yourself to sense the energy of each card?

And not for the sake of being correct – remember, lots of this stuff is to get ego out of the way – but for the sake of knowing how to know.

Think about that. Knowing how to know.

If you can teach yourself to sense which card should be played, you can teach yourself to know which foods to eat, which cars to buy, which people to ask out on a date, which jobs to go after, … Hot dang but the list is endless.

And much of that involves teaching yourself to be patient (and if you don’t think being patient is a test of ego… The number of people who are impatient with themselves is staggering.

And think about this for a second. If you can’t be patient with your own learning – because that’s what this is, your own learning – why should you expect others to be patient with you when you’re learning. Now push it out one step further; If you’re not patient with yourself, can you truly be patient with others when they’re learning?).

So, as Susan often teaches, learn patience with yourself so you can be patient with others (an application of one of our Principles, that). As one of my teachers taught me, to learn to listen. To be aware. To care. To pay attention.

To yourself first and you’ll be shocked how self-compassion becomes compassion for others.

As I explained to one of the people I study with, once you get your ego out of the way, a whole new world opens up to you.

And just so you’ll know, statistics and probabilities don’t account for such things as we’re discussing here except as outlyers. These are the things that get thrown out of research studies because they don’t fit the curves or “the norm”.

Remember what you learned about the difference between probable and possible? Probable means (for example) “Out of 100 attempts, it’s happened 80 times therefore if you do it 100 times you’ll probably succeed 80% of the time.” Possible means “We don’t know of anybody else who can do it but there’s no reason you can’t do it.”

Welcome to the world of possible.


The first two images are what I sent to the fellow I’m studying with to demonstrate what’s possible. I’ve also included my comment to him regarding the images. What explanations can you come up with?

98% accuracy in Freecelll

100% accuracy in Klondike

See the attached images. I usually play five types of solitaires. Casino Klondike, Pyramid, Braid, Picture Gallery and one that is a Spider variation (maybe. Nobody seems to know it but me even though I was taught it when I was in gradeschool, probably 3-5th grade, somewhere in there). I play on computer, tablet and with physical decks.
The attached images aren’t for boasting, they are to show you what is possible. I’ve had “winning” streaks into the several hundreds in each game.

Q: How is that possible? (assuming I’m not cheating somehow)

Hint: Like you, when I care about winning, my scores drop into normal statistical averages.
Hint: When I’m freed of caring about winning, what else might I be able to do?

This last image is from today, about an hour ago, when I preparing to write this post.

92.5% overall

Remember, never let someone else’s limitations be your limitations (kind of a rephrase of one of our Principles).

About the author

Joseph Carrabis

Leave a Comment

4 Comments

  • I would typically comment on the lessons I learned from the Solitaire Meditation (and I will!), but also I’ll comment on how Joseph taught it to me and why I’m thankful for the method as much as the lesson.

    Joseph challenged me to “figure out” how to win at solitaire, and suggested the best way to do that was to pay attention to the conditions were typically present during a win. That could include initial card layouts, the kind of cards being used, where and how I was sitting, the weather outside, whether my dog was nearby or not… anything at all. The idea was that if I could figure out the winning conditions, I could learn to replicate those conditions and win consistently.

    I wasn’t told what big overarching thing I was supposed to be learning, or how I was supposed to solve the problem. I’m sure Joseph had taken the same approach with me all along, but the Solitaire Meditation was the first time where it became obvious to me.

    After many, many… MANY rounds of cards under every conceivable condition (and using a spreadsheet to track them all), I sent Joseph an email with the following comment in it: “Solitaire has been frustratingly elusive. The only consistency I’ve noticed in winning so far is to not be caring about winning,” which is what led to the images and comment he notes in the post.

    Joseph is fantastic about giving me hints, but he will not give away the answer. This lesson was the moment that I realized the best way for me to learn is to discover the answer – and the lesson – myself (with a few heavy pokes in the right direction from Joseph). The lessons hit home in a far deeper and more profound way than if I was simply told what to do. Training with Joseph and Susan for me has been, and continues to be, a voyage of self-discovery, not a series of homework assignments. It brought whole new meaning to another blog post by Joseph, Enjoy The Ride.

    And for that I will always be thankful.

  • I believe we teach as we’ve been taught, and depends a lot of what our true teachers taught us about themselves, ourselves, and how to nourish what’s inside of us.
    One of my first teachers was so-o-o frustrating! He always gave hints and never answers. I remember so wanting to give up and he wouldn’t let me. He’d help me to calm down, relax, breath, center, and then tell me that no problem was so great, no answer was so obscure or hidden, that it couldn’t be solved or the answer found.
    All I needed to do was be willing to learn. First, make sure I understand the problem. Maybe old methods can solve it and maybe new methods can solve it better.
    Or maybe the problem I’m solving isn’t the real problem at all, maybe I’m making a known solution fit a problem, which means I’m not solving the true problem at all.
    Just be willing to look.

  • I’ve just re-read this post again, months later. There are far more lessons here than I initially thought. Knowing how to know, but also for me – knowing that I know, trusting that I know, and letting the analyst inside me (the side of myself I can clearly see coming through in my first comment above), have a rest.

  • It’s an odd thing about The Practice (something I’ve noticed in my life); I’ve yet to encounter some lesson that is only at one level. Everything I’ve learned and am learning has its own onion skin. Peel back a level and there’s more to the lesson than there was before.
    Congratulations on your most “recent” learning.